About Me

Name:meg
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Red Skelton could teach Obama a thing or Two

Subject: Red Skelton
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:25:28 -0400
We never missed the Red Skeleton Show, growing up. Please share with
 
your family and friends
This is so unbelievable. In 1969, how did he know?
Some of you may remember him but he passed away before many of you
were
born. Red Skelton was a good & funny man. He also ended every show
by
saying, 'GOOD NIGHT AND GOD BLESS.' Listen to the end of this. It is
 
something he said 39 years ago.
Very important that you listen to the very end! Eerie! Take a moment
 
and listen to it (from 1969). How would he have known that this is
what
is happening?
Click on the link, and turn your sound on:
 
 
________________________________
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CHICAGO MEDIA COVERING UP OBAMA/ WRIGHT FOOTAGE

Obama found in video at Wright’s church, signing books with Wright’s praise, praying with his kids in the pews and more. see below. no wonder Obama is hustling those SDs and telling Hillary to leave the race so much. Tip of the iceberg?
Art3
http://www.newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/religion_theseeker/2007/03/hallelujah_bara.html
watch video of Obama and HIS CHILDREN AT SERVICES AT WRIGHTS CHURCH…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7DGI_IqX24
CHICAGO MEDIA COVERING UP OBAMA WRIGHT FOOTAGE
During the recent media super storm: Obama’s Pastor Disaster, CBS 2 Chicago has strangely not released video they have of Obama at Trinity United Church of Christ for a Book Signing / Church Service with Pastor Wright. According to a Chicago Tribune article, at the Service Obama spoke to the cheering congregation and the choir sang, “Hallelujah Barack”. After the service Wright and Obama sat together, laughing , talking and signing books. Leaving one to wonder, if a republican candidate had this sort of controversy swirling around would the footage have found it’s way to the national and cable news networks by now?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DEFENDING GRANDMA

Defending Obama's grandmother

From a glowing profile of her in the Honolulu Advertiser:

But several current and former Bank of Hawaii executives — some of whom were mentored by Dunham and knew her after she retired — said they were stunned by Obama's comments about his grandmother.

"I was real surprised that he indicated that," said Dennis Ching, who was a 23-year-old management trainee under Dunham beginning in 1966. "I never heard her say anything like that. I never heard her say anything negative about anything. And she never swore."

Obama may have been referring, the profile notes, to a specific incident he mentioned in his book. Also, she's been watching the whole thing on CNN.

 


 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CONGRESSMAN LAMAR SMITH TX, WANTS TO GIVE AWAY U.S JOBS AGAIN

Emergency Bill Helps High-Tech Companies
  Ranking Member Lamar Smith today introduced a bill to address American companies' immediate need for high-tech, specialty workers. The "Strengthening United States Technology and Innovation Now Act (SUSTAIN Act)" raises the annual cap for H-1B visas to 195,000 for 2008 and 2009.
To help meet constituent needs, I provide timely information in my E-Newsletter that may be of interest. It includes my positions on issues and links to statements and other informational materials. Please view recent news below... I look forward to continuing to communicate with you and your family through our online community. Sincerely,Congressman Lamar Smith
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT

HIS FATHER WAS A KENYAN, MUSLIM, BLACK- WE HAVE SEEN PICTURES OF HIS
AFRICAN FAMILY.

HIS MOTHER IS A KANSAN, ATHEIST, WHITE
-WHERE ARE THE PICTURES OF HIS KANSAN, WHITE MOTHER AND HIS WHITEGRANDPARENTS WHO RAISED HIM ?

HIS FATHER DESERTED HIS MOTHER AND HIM WHEN HE WAS VERY YOUNG AND  WENT
BACK TO HIS FAMILY IN KENYA.

HIS MOTHER MARRIED AN INDONESIAN MUSLIM AND TOOK HIM TO JAKARTA  WHERE HE
WAS  SCHOOLED IN A MUSLIM SCHOOL.

HIS MOTHER RETURNED TO HAWAII, AND HE WAS RAISED BY HIS WHITE KANSAN GRANDPARENTS.

HE LATER WENT TO THE BEST HIGH DOLLAR SCHOOLS IN THE UNITED STATES.  HOW?  WHO PAID FOR HIS EDUCATION?

HE LIVES IN A $1.4 MILLION DOLLAR HOUSE THAT HE ACQUIRED THROUGH A DEAL
WITH A WEALTHY FUND RAISER...... HOW?
 
HE 'WORKED' AS A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVIST IN CHICAGO.  HE HAS NEVER HELD A
PRODUCTIVE JOB.  THE PRESIDENCY IS NOT A CIVIL RIGHTS POST.

NOR IS IT SUBJECT TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SET ASIDES.

HE ENTERED POLITICS AT THE STATE LEVEL AND THEN THE NATIONAL LEVEL, WHERE HE HAS MINIMAL EXPERIENCE.

HE IS PROUD OF HIS 'AFRICAN HERITAGE',  BUT IT SEEMS THAT HIS ONLY AFRICAN
CONNECTION WAS THAT HIS AFRICAN FATHER GOT A WHITE GIRL PREGNANT AND
DESERTED HER.  I DIDN'T KNOW THAT SPERM CARRIED A 'CULTURAL' GENE.
 
WHERE IS THE PRIDE IN HIS WHITE CULTURE?
HE GOES TO AN  'AFROCENTRIC' CHURCH THAT HATES WHITES, HATES JEWS, AND
BLAMES AMERICA FOR ALL THE WORLD'S PERCEIVED FAULTS.

AND THEN REPEATEDLY COVERS UP FOR THE PASTOR AND THE CHURCH.

HE CLAIMS THAT HE COULD NOT CONFRONT HIS PASTOR BUT HE WANTS US TO BELIEVE
THAT HE CAN CONFRONT NORTH KOREA AND IRAN... RIGHT  !!!

YEAH, I THINK I SEE HOW HE COULD BE A UNITER AND BRING US TOGETHER. 
 
I THINK THE HOPE IS THAT HE HOPES NO ONE WILL PUT THE PIECES TOGETHER !!
 
 
 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MEXICAN BILLIONAIRES RAKE IN THE CASH

Memo From Mexico, By Allan Wall

Mexican Billionaires Rake In The Cash While Middle Class Americans Are Called Racists

Forbes magazine has just published its Annual Billionaires List. The 2008 Billionaire List  has 1062 entries—and includes no less than ten (10) Mexican billionaires. Indeed, in second place worldwide is Mexico’s Carlos Slim, worth $60 billion.

Two years ago, I wrote a VDARE.COM article about the Mexican magnates on the 2006 billionaires list, which you can read here . It was followed up by an article about Mexican magnates investing in the United States.

Why is the presence of Mexican billionaires relevant to the U.S. National Question, the subject of the VDARE.COM?

It wouldn’t be, if Americans weren’t constantly lectured by the media and our leaders to open the border to Mexican immigrants. White middle class Americans are special targets of such propaganda. They are led to believe they are horrible racists if they don’t want their neighborhoods overrun with legal and illegal aliens from Mexico.

But why should middle-class Americans bear the brunt of-out-of-control mass immigration when Mexico has at least 10 billionaires who should be doing a lot more to create jobs in Mexico?

By world standards, Mexico is far from the poorest country in the world. It has plenty of resources and economic advantages. They have just been mismanaged.

But there is plenty of wealth in Mexico. I have resided here since 1991, and have had some contact with the local wealthy in the metropolitan area in which I live. And many wealthy Mexicans sure like to flaunt their wealth.

I remember in my very first teaching job—when I was rather naïve, I admit. I was telling my fifth-graders (who already had a good level of English) that knowing English better could help them get rich.

"We’re already rich", retorted one girl. Of course, she was right. What was I thinking, these kids were richer than me!

On another occasion, I invited the kids to accompany me outside, where snow flurries were falling, since it hardly ever snows in that region. But some of them weren’t interested—after all, they regularly flew to ski resorts in the U.S.!

And these kids weren’t even from millionaire families, of which there are plenty. But what Forbes is talking about is billionaires—dollar billionaires—and the magazine lists 10 of them.

In fact, it’s highly unlikely there are only 10 billionaires in Mexico. A private analyst (whose name I won’t divulge) has sent me his own Mexican billionaire list. According to his analysis, Mexico has 28 billionaires, 18 of whom are not listed by Forbes. The unlisted billionaires keep a lower profile and hide or don’t report or all their assets. That seems highly likely. It’s been estimated that 40% of Mexican businesses and 70% of Mexican professionals and small business owners cheat on taxes, so that up to 50% of potential tax revenues go uncollected. [Mexico planning to raise its tax receipts, By Marla Dickerson, and Carlos Martinez. Los Angeles Times, Jun 21, 2007 (Pay archive)]

Nor does Forbes report the wealth of Mexican narco-magnates, whose millions of satisfied American customers have made them quite wealthy. It’s highly likely, though, given the narco-barons’ use of legitimate businesses as fronts, that some of their wealth gets included as parts of the fortunes listed in Forbes anyway.

Nevertheless, the Forbes list is significant because it includes the ten legitimate, high-profile billionaires. Studying these men can tell us something about wealth in Mexico.

Top Mexican magnate, as I mentioned earlier: Carlos Slim. In 2006 and 2007, Slim was listed by Forbes as the world’s third-richest man. But in August 2007, rival Fortune magazine declared him the world’s richest man.   Now, in the latest Forbes list, Slim is in second place worldwide, right behind #1 Warren Buffett and right ahead of Bill Gates at #3.

In calculating this kind of wealth, much depends on how much each man’s stock holdings are worth. Forbes did its calculation on February 11th, and on that day Slim, at $60 billion, was a mere 2 billion dollars behind Warren Buffet’s $62 billion, and a scant 2 billion dollars ahead of Bill Gates’ $58 billion.

When you’re talking that kind of money, what’s a couple of billion here or there?

Mexican per capita income is less than US $12,000 and about half the population lives below the poverty line, according to the World Bank. Yet in the past two years, Slim has doubled his worth, from $30 billion to $60 billion.

The man known as "King Midas" or "The Engineer" really made it into the big leagues back in 1990 when he bought Telmex (Teléfonos de México) during President Carlos Salinas’ privatizations (translation : crony capitalism ). Slim still has Telmex (which controls over 90% of Mexico’s landlines, Telcel (which controls almost 80% of the Mexican cell phone market) and América Móvil, Latin America’s biggest wireless provider.

But Carlos Slim is not limited to telecommunications and related industries. This guy sells everything. It’s doubtful that any resident of Mexico can escape putting more money in his already-voluminous pockets. Slim has a bank, an airline, department stores, restaurants and music outlets. Slim sells insurance, auto parts, and ceramic tile. The Mexican government pays Slim to construct roads, water treatment plants, petroleum platforms, et cetera.

My principal email account is with Prodigy, another Carlos Slim company. (In Mexico, Prodigy holds 92% of the ISP market). So that means my articles are sent to VDARE.COM on Carlos Slim’s email network!

Thank you, Carlos Slim!

As I’ve pointed out before, Slim is an open borders booster. He has attacked the proposed American border fence (which may never get completed anyway) as "illegal" and "absurd."

Why doesn’t Slim want us to control our border? I think because the World’s Second Richest Man fears that, if the emigration safety valve were shut down, more Mexicans would start to notice his wealth—and contrast it with their poverty.

Since Slim is so outspoken in telling us how to run our immigration policy, shouldn’t we reciprocate by telling him how to manage his wealth? I would think that 60 billion dollars ought to be able to create a lot more jobs for Slim’s fellow Mexicans.

Now, I happen to personally know one of Slim’s Telmex employees, and he has some good benefits. That’s great, but how about spreading the wealth around some more?

Slim, with all his wealth and monopolistic enterprises, currently employs about a quarter of a million Mexicans. Honestly, I think he could do much better than that.

Maybe Slim could even give some money away!

Let’s take a quick look at the other 9 Mexican billionaires listed by Forbes:

bullet Alberto Bailleres is chairman of metallurgical giant Penoles, has luxury retailer Palacio de Hierro and GNP insurance company, owns interests in the fields of finance and agriculture and raises bulls for  bullfighting.

bullet German Larrea Mota-Velasco, at $7.3 billion the third-wealthiest Mexican, is a lumber and mining magnate. His Grupo Mexico has been helped greatly by rising copper prices. Larrea also controls Mexico’s biggest railroad.

bullet Ricardo Salinas Pliego, worth 6.3 billion U.S. dollars, runs the Grupo Elektra retail chain, the TV Azteca network, mobile carrier Unefon (competing with Slim) and has even opened his own bank which serves mostly low-income clients. Salinas is also marketing Chinese cars (but doesn’t that undercut the Mexican automobile industry?). TV Azteca’s subsidiary Azteca America broadcasts to Spanish-speakers in the U.S.

bullet Jeronimo Arango, worth $4.3 billion. His family company, Grupo Cifra, which included a supermarket chain, partnered with and later sold out to Wal-mart and became Wal-mart de México (Walmex). Arango also owns real estate.

bullet Isaac Saba , worth $2.1 billion, runs Grupo Casa Saba, which markets health, pharmaceutical and beauty products. Saba also partners with Telemundo (similar to Univision) to produce telenovelas (somewhat similar to soap operas). Saba has textile interests, real estate and Marriott hotels in Cancun and Puerto Vallarta.

bullet Roberto Hernandez Ramirez, worth $1.7 billion, was CEO of Banamex when that bank sold out to Citigroup, for which he serves as a director. Hernandez also owns resorts on the Yucatan Peninsula.

bullet Emilio Azcarraga Jean, worth $1.6 billion, runs media giant Grupo Televisa, famous for, among other things, its telenovelas—the company is now making Chinese versions! By the way, Televisa owns 11% of Univision, and Azcarraga has considered taking out American citizenship so he can acquire more. After all, what’s American citizenship about if not increasing your wealth?

bullet Alfredo Harp Helu, worth $1.6 billion, is Carlos Slim’s cousin. Like Hernandez, Harp made big bucks off the Banamex sell-out to Citigroup, and also owns the Mexico City Red Devils baseball team.

bullet  Lorenzo Zambrano, Mexico’s tenth-richest man, is head of cement giant Cemex, which is, by the way, the biggest cement company operating in the U.S.A., and one of the world’s biggest. Additionally, Zambrano boasts the world’s biggest Ferrari collection.

What can we learn from this? They are all very sharp individuals, to be sure. However, not a one of them is known for major technical innovations. Some built their fortunes on inherited wealth, all were in the right place at the right time and shrewdly took advantage of their opportunities. Several of these men are as wealthy as they are because they sold out to a bigger company.

And of course, their political connections were important. In the old Mexico, under the one-party PRI state, there was only one party that counted. But in the new Mexico, no party has a monopoly on political power. So now you have to curry favor with more than one party, which is exactly what Carlos Slim has done.

Not one of the ten billionaires looks like a Mexican Indian, although 90% of Mexico’s population has at least some Mexican Indian ancestry, which is not surprising.

Seven of the billionaires have European, predominantly Spanish, ancestry, which is not surprising either. In fact, one of them (Arango) was actually born in Spain. Azcarraga has a French mother, and his Azcarraga surname is Basque—the Basques of northern Spain and southwestern France speak a non Indo-European language. (My wife has Basque ancestry on both sides of her family).

Three of the billionaires are of Middle Eastern origin. Slim and Harp are of Lebanese Maronite ancestry; Saba is of Lebanese Jewish descent.

Is it bad that these guys have all this money? Not necessarily.

But the extreme gap between these mega-moguls and Mexico’s poor is impressive.

It explains why all Mexico’s rich would prefer that the "Mexodus"—post-1965 mass emigration to the U.S.—continue. It keeps the pressure off them.

But that’s no reason Americans should continue to put up with it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FIREMAN LAID OFF CAN'S SPEAK SPANISH, IN AMERICA:

 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FR5Mjz...

 

Spanish Can Lose Jobs

Oregon Begins To Strictly Enforce Language Rule

POSTED: 3:46 pm MDT June 22, 2006
UPDATED: 2:26 pm MDT June 23, 2006

 

With 24 major wildfires burning across the southwestern United States, fire officials need every firefighter they can get. They've done that in Oregon, but it's created another problem.

 

Officials are now having to lay off some of the bosses who manage those firefighting crews because the bosses are not bilingual. Many of the newer hires in Oregon only speak Spanish. Surprised

 

"What we do know is 85 percent of the crew makeup is of Hispanic descent," said Jim Walker, with the Oregon Department of Forestry.

 

The state said all bosses must speak the same language of their crew on the fire lines for safety reasons. They want to make sure that the leader of the crews can quickly communicate during an emergencey if the fire turns or if there is another problem on the fire lines.

 

"Our main concern is that they are safe, and they are in a safe environment, and a lot of that deals with communication," Walker said.

 

Because of the state's language requirement, Jaime Pickering can no longer work as a crew boss and supervise 20 firefighters. He can only manage a squad of four firefighters.

 

"If you have one Spanish guy on the crew, as an English crew boss, you can no longer be a crew boss. You have to step back to a squad boss, which is a demotion," Pickering said. Surprised

 

The state of Oregon actually made the change in 2003, after a devastating wildfire season in 2002 had contractors scrambling to find help. The state just started strictly monitoring the law this year, as Hispanics continued to fill fire lines.

 

"I think the (rule) is good, because that's for safety purpose," said Manuel Franco, who is a contractor for fire crews. He thinks the state's rule is necessary for worker safety.

 

"If there's a rock rolling down, everybody should understand that," Franco said.

 

But he does wish it were different.

 

"We're living here. We should speak the language," he said.

 

So why couldn't the state require that these crew members speak English? The state doesn't have a clear answer. Yell

 

"If it comes down to a safety issue, and it's determined that's the only way we can have people safely on an incident, then yes," Walker said.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama has a drean, does it include you?

Obama Has A Dream—But Does It Include You?
http://www.vdare.com/epstein/080319_obama.htm


Obama Has A Dream—But Does It Include You?

By Marcus Epstein
Barack Obama’s speech on race relations has been hailed as visionary. Former Senator Harris Wofford (D-Pennsylvania) compared it to the Gettysburg Address and Rep. Jim Moran (D.-VA) compared it to Martin Luther King’s "I Have a Dream" speech. Even conservative author Charles Murray said:
"Has any other major American politician ever made a speech on race that comes even close to this one? As far as I'm concerned, it is just plain flat out brilliant—rhetorically, but also in capturing a lot of nuance about race in America."
No one can deny that Obama is an orator. (Click here for NRO's Kathleen Parker getting all dreamy over the Obama speech.) But what "nuance" does he actually take up?
To the extent that there is anything new in Obama’s speech, it is that he asks African Americans to take "full responsibility for own lives" and says that "they must always believe that they can write their own destiny".
A great example of blacks not being expected to take responsibility for their own actions is the Jena Six case. The line fed by Al Sharpton and the Main Stream Media is that a group of African Americans who beat and kicked a white student half to death should be let off because a noose was supposedly hung in a tree by a different student three months earlier.
Yet rather than saying these criminals were responsible for their own actions, Obama said on his website that the protesters who converged on Jena were carrying forth
“the legacy of all those who sat at lunch counters and took freedom rides to strike a blow against injustice wherever it may exist. When a noose hangs from a schoolyard tree in the 21st century and young men are treated in a way that is not equal nor just, it is not just an offense to the people of Jena or to the African-American community, it is an offense to the ideals we hold as Americans. I renew my call for the District Attorney to drop the excessive charges filed in this case, and I will continue my decades-long fight against injustice and division as President.”
In his Philadelphia speech, Obama blamed black crime on "reduced economic opportunity" caused by past discrimination. Clearly, he attributes most ills of the African American community to the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.
In other words, Obama ignores the missing piece of the puzzle. Over the last 50 years, we have not just ended legalized segregation: we have spent billions of dollars and created countless programs to try to make up for the past.
None of this has worked. Some of it has even made the problems worse.
When Obama bemoans that schools haven’t been integrated 50 years after Brown vs. Board of Education, he forgets the court decisions, forced busing, redistricting, and a plethora of federal programs and administrators that have yielded no result. He also omits that the "pervasive achievement gap" between different racial groups exists at schools with all levels of diversity.
Obama is being praised for acknowledging that whites’ unease about busing, urban crime, and affirmative action are not necessarily rooted in "racism". Yet although he said these were "legitimate concerns", he does not see adopting colorblind education policies or letting police and courts crack down on crime as a solution. Instead he blames conservative talk show hosts for inflaming "resentments" (a word he only uses to describe white frustration) that are fundamentally a distraction from "a corporate culture rife with insider dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many".
Despite Obama’s claim that whites should not be considered racists for worrying about urban crime, he did manage to criticize his living white grandmother’s racial insensitivity (as it turns out, for refusing to take the bus after she was harassed by bums). He apparently sees as equivalent to his preacher’s viscerally anti-white racial rantings that forced the need for Obama’s speech in the first place.
Obama agonized about his grandmother’s concern about riding public transportation in his book  						Dreams From My Father Dreams From My Father . Buthe has never criticized Wright’s racial views, let alone "condemned [them] in unequivocal terms", as he claimed in his speech, until the controversy first began to bubble a few months ago.
Beneath the pretty rhetoric about hope and responsibility, the gist of Obama’s speech is the same old left wing view of race relations: The problems facing the African American community, he says, are the result of past and present discrimination. They need to be addressed, he believes, by government regulations and redistribution. At the same time, he thinks, all white concerns about these programs are created by demagogues who persuade the working and middle class that hostile minorities, rather than corporations, could be responsible for some of their problems.
The latter argument is the same left wing talk seen in books like The Redneck Manifestohttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=vdare&l=ur2&o=1 and to a lesser extent What’s The Matter With Kansas:http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=vdare&l=ur2&o=1 the only possible reason working and middle class voters would vote Republican is that they’ve been fooled by big business by being concerned about something other than their lack of socialized medicine.
In his latest book, The Audacity of Hopehttp://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=vdare&l=ur2&o=1—whose title was coined by Rev. Wright—Obama discusses the limits of the politics of white guilt. In part because of "the success of conservatives in fanning the politics of resentment", white guilt has "largely exhausted itself in America; even the most fair-minded of whites… tend to push back against suggestions of racial victimization—or race-specific claims based on the history of race discrimination in this country". Obama suggested that the issues could be addressed in a universal rather than group-based sense.
This is exactly what he did in his speech. He called for the same failed liberal policies on race. But he made the appeals as something we need to do as a country, rather than to the benefit one group at the expense of the other.
Obama may not share Rev. Wright’s racist views—or is at least he may be smart enough not to shout about them.
But if elected, he will enact the same racist policies.
__________________
Attrition Through Enforcement - The Most Effective means for ridding the nation of illegal aliens.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NAFTA

    Reply, quoting this comment    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
May 25, 2007
Private Message
PREMEDITATED MERGER
Mexican official says NAFTA includes superhighways
'Transportation linking the United States, Mexico and Canada is key to the future'

Posted: March 18, 2008
10:56 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

While President Bush and other U.S. officials have derided fears of a NAFTA superhighway as merely conspiracy theory, a Mexican transportation expert contends the trade agreement includes plans for a network of international ship, rail and truck connections to deliver consumer goods from China and the Far East to Mexico, the U.S. and Canada.

"Transportation linking the United States, Mexico and Canada is key to the future of NAFTA," Eduardo Aspero, president of the Mexican Intermodal Association, told a recent luncheon sponsored by the Free Trade Alliance San Antonio.

In transportation economics, the term "intermodal" refers to the ability to move a container by crane to different modes of transportation, including ship, truck and railroad, without having to unpack or repack the container.

"It was interesting how the NAFTA transportation network so vehemently denied by the U.S. government was alive and well in Aspero's speech and openly discussed in San Antonio," said Terri Hall, founder of the San Antonio Toll Party.

WND reported President Bush, while attending the third annual summit of the Security and Prosperity Partnership meeting in Quebec last August said in an internationally televised press conference that those who believe the SPP might lead to NAFTA superhighways or a North American Union are "conspiracy theorists."

Hall, who attended Aspero's San Antonio speech, is a political activist whose website, TexasTurf.org, is dedicated to fighting the Trans-Texas Corridor and the expansion of toll roads in the state.

Aspero focused on plans by the Chinese firm of Hutchison Ports Holdings to develop the deep-water Mexican ports of Lazaro Cardenas and Manzanillo, on the Pacific Ocean south of Texas, to bring containers from China into North America.

As WND has reported, Hutchison Ports Holdings is paying billions of dollars to deepen Mexican ports such as Lazaro Cardenas and Manzanillo in anticipation of the arrival of post-Pamamex mega-ships capable of holding up to 12,500 containers currently being built for Chinese shipping lines.

WND also has reported how the U.S. southern border is being blurred for the benefit of global trade, with the official website of the Mexican northeastern state of Nuevo Leon disclosing plans to extend the Trans-Texas Corridor south through Monterrey to connect with Pacific ports in Mexico.

Aspero noted that currently 400,000 containers a year are being transported by truck and rail from Mexican ports on the Pacific into the U.S.Surprised

"The purpose of ports such as Lazaro Cardenas is to facilitate the cost-efficient transportation of container goods from Asia into the United States," he explained.Surprised

"Lazaro Cardenas is the new hope for intermodalism in Mexico," Aspero said, noting that Lazaro Cardenas is Mexico's deepest port at 49 feet, capable of accepting virtually any cargo ship in the world.Surprised

"Aspero noted that the largest markets for the Chinese-manufactured goods are at the center of the United States and in the Northeast," Hall said.Surprised

"He was trying to explain why multi-national corporations engaged in global trade continue to pressure the Bush administration," she continued. "Their goal is to cut loose American longshoremen on the West Coast in favor of the cheaper Mexican labor that can get goods into the interior of the United States through the southern route from these Mexican ports on the Pacific."Surprised

Aspero also argued the Automated Manifest System (AMS) put in place by U.S. Customs in 2002 is a key development in North American intermodal transportation.

"AMS allows cargo from Asia to go through Mexican ports virtually without any physical inspection," he explained. "AMS pre-clears cargo at the point of origin, not at the border when the container enters the YellUnited States."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IF THE TRUTH WERE KNOWN ?

Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.
Desert Conservative

What if 20 Million Illegal Aliens Vacated America?
Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News wrote a
column titled, “Mexican Visitor’s Lament” — 10/25/07. She interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while
visiting Denver last week. Hernandez said, “They (illegal aliens) pay rent,
buy groceries, buy clothes…What Happens to your country’s economy if 20
million people go away?” That’s a good question - it deserves an answer.
Over 80 percent of Americans demand secured borders and illegal migration
stopped. But what would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America?
The answers may surprise you!

In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico,
it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems,
bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons. It would leave highways cleaner,
safer and less congested. Everyone could understand one another as English
became the dominant language again.

In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and
grand-kids - would move back ‘home’, mostly to Mexico. That would save
Coloradans an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 billion) annually
in taxes that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration
costs. It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone.

Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the
terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens. Denver
Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered
death, accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.

Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67 percent
drop-out/flunk-out rate because of thousands of illegal alien students
speaking 41 different languages. At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from
our gridlocked cities in Colorado.

Denver’s four percent unemployment rate would vanish as our working
poor would gain jobs at a living wage.

In Florida, 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State
back to America, the rule of law, and English.

In Chicago, Illinois, 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals,
schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free
experience.

If 20 million illegal aliens returned ‘home’ –

If 20 million illegal aliens returned ‘home’, the U.S. Economy would
return to the rule of law. Employers would hire legal American citizens at a
living wage. Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they
wouldn’t be working off the books. That would result in an additional $401
Billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for
local, state and city coffers.

No more push ‘1′ for Spanish or ‘2′ for English. No more confusion
in American schools that now must contend with over 100 languages that
degrade the educational system for American kids. Our overcrowded schools
would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in
ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.

We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of
more than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who
distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country.

In cities like L.A., 20,000 members of the ‘18th Street Gang‘ would
vanish from our nation. No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from
Americans! No more foreign rapists and child molesters!

Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our crowded
highways and gridlock. Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American
deaths by illegal aliens!

America’s economy is drained. Taxpayers are harmed. Employers get
rich. Over $80 billion annually wouldn’t return to the aliens’ home
countries by cash transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money
untaxed, which further drains America’s economy - which currently suffers an
$8.7 trillion debt.

At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country,
costing us $109 billion per year per cycle. At least 86 hospitals in
California, Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being
bankrupt out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act.

Americans wouldn’t suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases
rampant in our country-brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders.

Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and
grid locking our cities. It would also put the ‘progressives’ on the horns
of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11 percent of our
greenhouse gases.

Over one million of Mexico’s poorest citizens now live inside and
along our border from Brownsville, Texas to San Diego, California in what
the New York Times called, “colonias” or new neighborhoods. Trouble is,
those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty,
filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without
sewage, clean water, streets, electricity, roads or any kind of sanitation.
The New York Times reported them to be America’s new “Third World” inside
our own country. Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect
20 million residents of those colonias. (I’ve seen them personally in Texas
and Arizona; it’s sickening beyond anything you can imagine.) By enforcing
our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico.

We should invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own
countries and/or make a better life in Mexico. We already invite a million
people into our country legally more than all other countries combined
annually. We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy
within our borders and growing lawlessness at every level in our nation.
It’s time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and our
way of life.

Interesting Statistics. Here are 14 reasons illegal aliens should
vacate America, and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they
are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them:

1. $11 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare
to illegal aliens.

2. $2.2 billion dollars are spent each year on food assistance
programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal
aliens. 3. $2.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for illegal
aliens.

4. $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary
school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of
English!

5. $17 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the
American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.

6. $3 Million Dollars PER DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal
aliens.

7. 30% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens.

8. $90 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for
welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.html

9. $200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are
caused by the illegal aliens.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that’s
two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their
children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html

11. During the year 2005, there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens
that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from
terrorist countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroine,
and marijuana crossed into the U.S. from the southern border.

12. The National Policy Institute, estimates that the total cost of
mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost
of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.

13. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances
back to their countries of origin.

14. The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex
crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States!”

The total cost is a whopping $338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR!!!

Lee ADDS: Our Main Stream Media is so busy trying to get Barak Obama elected that they WILL NOT report factual NEWS!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US TO BUILD EGYPT FENCE 23 MILLION

US to help Egypt prevent smuggling on Gaza border

America transfers $23 million worth of aid to Egyptians, agrees to send engineering teams to assist in locating smuggling tunnels; budget also for building sturdier fence on Gaza-Egypt border

US helping Egypt build border fence on Gaza frontier: American officials have agreed to a $23 million aid package from which most will go towards purchasing technology to prevent the fence from being perforated and for locating underground smuggling conduits, according to information received in the Israeli political circuit.

From details that were made known to Ynet, the US intends to send teams from the US Army Corps of Engineers to the Egyptian side of the Gaza-Egypt border in the near future. Theses teams will assist Egyptian forces deployed along the frontier pinpoint the locations of smuggling tunnels west of the border in the Rafah area.

n recent days, Cairo is completing the construction of a stone wall on the border. At the same time, Egypt has positioned a specially-trained police force near the new wall in order to prevent a new perforation in the fence. The US teams will brief the Egyptian force, which numbers around 750 personnel.

In Jerusalem, Israel officials are welcoming the move. Nonetheless, Israel also believes that more hard work is needed in order to stop the flow of terrorists and weapons from Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula into the Gaza Strip.

Amos Gilad, head of the political-military bureau at the Defense Ministry, traveled to Washington this week to speak with US officials about an arrangement with the Egyptians over the border fence. Gilad also stopped in Cairo, where he met with Egyptian Intelligence Chief Omar Suleiman. The two discussed the issue of reopening the Rafah border crossing.

Israel has requested that the terminal be operated under international supervision by European Union monitors and that Palestinian Authority representatives from Fatah man the crossing on the Palestinian side. The issue is still up for contention since Hamas opposes any type of supervision on the terminal.

An Israeli official cautioned that there was still a long way to go. "More time is needed to take care of all the sensitive issues," he said. Among other things, Egypt is asking to add 750 soldiers and police to its side of the Egypt-Israel border. The issue is currently a bone of contention between the Foreign and Defense Ministries.

The Defense Ministry claims that the issues necessitate the reopening of the Camp David peace accords that were signed between Israel and Egypt in 1978. Conversely, the Foreign Ministry is ready to accept an Egyptian bolstering of forces if it deals with the entire Israel-Egypt border not just the area around the Gaza Strip.

Well there you have it folks. Our government believes it is more important to help Egypt secure it’s borders, then it is to secure ours.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's church, linked with terrorists?


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.p...w&pageId=59456

Obama church published
Hamas terror manifesto
Compares charter calling for murder
of Jews to Declaration of Independence




By Aaron Klein
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook
JERUSALEM – Sen. Barack Obama's Chicago church reprinted a manifesto by Hamas that defended terrorism as legitimate resistance, refused to recognize the right of Israel to exist and compared the terror group's official charter – which calls for the murder of Jews – to America's Declaration of Independence.
The Hamas piece was published on the "Pastor's Page" of the Trinity United Church of Christ newsletter reserved for Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., whose anti-American, anti-Israel remarks landed Obama in hot water, prompting the presidential candidate to deliver a major race speech earlier this week.
Hamas, responsible for scores of shootings, suicide bombings and rocket launchings against civilian population centers, is listed as a terrorist group by the U.S. State Department.
The revelation follows a recent WND article quoting Israeli security officials who expressed "concern" about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group.
In his July 22, 2007, church bulletin, Wright reprinted an article by Mousa Abu Marzook, identified in the newsletter as a "deputy of the political bureau of Hamas." A photo image of the newsletter was captured and posted today by the business blog BizzyBlog. The Hamas piece was first published by the Los Angeles Times, garnering the newspaper much criticism.
According to senior Israeli security officials, Marzook, who resides in Syria alongside Hamas chieftain Khaled Meshaal, is considered the "brains" behind Hamas, designing much of the terror group's policies and ideology. Israel possesses what it says is a large volume of specific evidence that Marzook has been directly involved in calling for or planning scores of Hamas terrorist offensives, including deadly suicide bombings. He was also accused of attempting to set up a Hamas network in the U.S.
Marzook's original piece was titled, "Hamas' stand" but was re-titled "A Fresh View of the Palestinian Struggle" by Obama's church newsletter. The newsletter also referred to Hamas as the "Islamic Resistance Movement," and added in its introduction that Marzook was addressing Hamas' goals for "all of Palestine."
In the manifesto, Marzook refers to Hamas' "resistance" – the group's perpetuation of anti-Israel terrorism targeting civilians – as "legal resistance," which, he argues, is "explicitly supported by the Fourth Geneva Convention."
The Conven