About Me

Name:meg
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

just more questions

http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/tblankley/2008/tb_06111.shtml
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

news strory just posted

ELECTION 2008
Is Obama's candidacy constitutional?
Secrecy over birth certificate, demand for 'natural-born' citizenship cited

Posted: June 10, 2008
9:44 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily


Barack Obama

Bloggers are raising questions about Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's qualifications to be U.S. president, because of the secrecy over his birth certificate and the requirement presidents be "natural-born" U.S. citizens.

Jim Geraghty, reporting on the Campaign Spot, a National Review blog, cited the "unlikely" but still circulating rumor that Obama was born not within the United States, but elsewhere, possibly Kenya.

Geraghty defined the concerns most clearly, stating: "If Obama were born outside the United States, one could argue that he would not meet the legal definition of natural-born citizen … because U.S. law at the time of his birth required his natural-born parent (his mother) to have resided in the United States for '10 years, at least [f]ive of which had to be after the age of 16.'"

He then points out Ann Dunham, Obama's mother, was 18 when Obama was born "so she wouldn't have met the requirement of five years after the age of 16."

Geraghty continues: " (Interestingly, apparently there isn't much paperwork on Obama's parents' marriage. 'Obama: From Promise to Power,' page. 27: 'Obama later confessed that he never searched for the government documents on the marriage, although Madelyn (Obama's maternal grandmother) insisted they were legally married.' Also note that Obama's father apparently was not legally divorced from his first wife back in Kenya at the time, a point of contention that ultimately led to their separation.)"

(Story continues below)


The reports released to date show Obama was born in Honolulu to Barack Hussein Obama Sr., of Nyangoma-Kogelo, Kenya, and Ann Dunham, of Wichita, Kan.

According to FindLaw.com, which is cited by Geraghty, the requirements that were in force from Dec. 24, 1952 to Nov. 13, 1986, encompassing the time of Obama's birth, state, "If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least 10 years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16."

Obama's father, a student sent to the United States from Africa, lived several places in the United States while attending class. He then returned to his homeland. Obama's mother later married another man and moved to Indonesia.

Geraghty said the Obama campaign could "debunk" the rumors about his birth simply by releasing a copy of his birth certificate, but the campaign has so far chosen not to do that.

"The campaign cited the birth certificate in their 'Fact Check' on William Ayers, so presumably, someone in the campaign has access to it," he said.

Hawaii doesn't make public information from birth certificates.

"If the concern of the Obama campaign is that the certificate includes his Social Security number or some other data that could be useful to identity thieves, that information could easily be blocked out and the rest released. (Although I wonder if identity thieves would find Obama a tougher than usual target, since using the name on purchases would almost inevitably bring closer scrutiny.)," Geraghty said.

The Obama campaign repeatedly has declined to respond to WND requests for comment.

The presumptive Republican nominee for president, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., already has gone through the same type of challenge, and the U.S. Senate responded with a resolution in April declaring him to be a "'natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States."

That article declares that "no person except a natural born citizen … shall be eligible to the Office of president."

McCain was challenged because he was born to two U.S. citizens in the Panama Canal Zone.

According to a report from Michael Dobbs on The Fact Checker, the McCain campaign consulted two leading jurists, Theodore Olsen and Laurence Tribe, and they agreed.

"They argue that McCain is a natural born citizen because the United States exercised sovereignty over the Panama Canal at the time of his birth on August 29, 1936, he was born on a U.S. military base, and both of his parents were U.S. citizens," the report said.

Others say the issue isn't quite that simple, and the matter could be resolved fully only by a constitutional amendment or a U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

new info on Obama, on Whites and his Citizenship

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66787



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBH7LfGK8A0&feature=related
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA MAY NOT BE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN

Very interesting!!!
        CAN OBAMA BE PRESIDENT?
It seems that Barack Obama is not qualified to be president after all for the following reason:
Barack Obama is not legally a  U.S.  natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between "December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two  U.S.  citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the  Panama Canal US Law very clearly stipulates: ".If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16." Barack Obama's father was not a U.S. citizen and Obama's mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which means though she had been a U.S. citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawaii being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama's birth, but *after* age 16. It doesn't matter *after* . In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic  U.S. citizenship. At most, there were only 2 years elapsed since his mother turned 16 at the time of Barack Obama's birth when she was 18 in Hawaii. His mother would have needed to have been 16+5= 21 years old, at the time of Barack Obama's birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen. As aforementioned, she was a young college student at the time and was not. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at that time his mother would have needed to have waited to have him as the only  U.S.  Citizen parent. Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him from holding the office.
*** Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President. *** Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, all the other info does not matter because his mother is the one who needed to have been a U.S. citizen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16. Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the country for some time to protect any citizenship he would have had, rather than living in Indonesia. Now you can see why Obama's aides stopped his speech about how we technically have more than 50 states, because it would have led to this discovery. This is very clear cut and a blaring violation of U.S. election law. I think the Gov. of California would be very interested in knowing this if Obama were elected President without being a natural-born U.S. citizen, and it would set precedence. Stay tuned to your TV sets because I suspect some of this information will be leaking through over the next several days.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Thomas Sowell
Rose and Milton Friedman Senior Fellow

The Hoover Institution

Stanford University

Stanford, California 94305
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA'S FORGOTTEN PEOPLE

MUST WATCH VIDEO :  
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP-YoB5mnZs&feature=related
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The real Obama

Democrat Nominee Obama Supports Illegal Immigration -- Click Below to Help Us Spread the TRUTH:
https://secure.responseenterprises.com/rightmarchpac/?a=7
ALERT: It's official -- Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. will be the Democrat nominee for President of the United States.



And if he becomes president, all hope for securing our borders against illegal immigration will be lost.

We MUST spread the TRUTH about Obama's plans!
  • In a March 2004 questionnaire, Obama was asked if the government should "crack down on businesses that hire illegal immigrants." His reply? "OPPOSE."
  • In June 2007, Obama voted AGAINST English as America's Official Language -- when 91% of American Citizens want English officially designated as our language.
  • In January of this year, in order to win Hispanic voters in California, Obama proclaimed his SUPPORT for granting driver's licenses to illegal aliens.
  • This year, Obama voted AGAINST increased funding for border security, 700 miles of fencing, and placing 6,000 National Guardsmen on the border.
  • Also this year, Obama voted FOR the "DREAM" Act, which would allow illegal aliens to receive in-state tuition rates at public universities, discriminating against U.S. citizens from out of state and law-abiding foreign students.
  • In September of 2007, when asked if he would allow "sanctuary cities" to exist, which ignore the federal law & provide sanctuary to illegal aliens, he REFUSED to answer the question.
  • In March of this year, Obama voted YES on continuing federal funds for declared "sanctuary cities."
  • In May of 2006, Obama voted YES to establish a "guest worker" program with a path to citizenship for ILLEGAL ALIENS.
  • Again in May of 2006, Obama voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security.
  • And, of course, Barack Obama voted YES on the McCain-Kennedy so-called "comprehensive immigration reform" AMNESTY bill.
This probably sums it up nicely: Obama was rated at just Eight Percent by the non-profit "U.S. Border Control" organization. Eight percent equals having an open-border stance.
THIS OPEN-BORDER ADVOCATE IS NOW… the Presidential nominee of the Democrat Party.
Barack Obama needs to be exposed for the pro-illegal immigration candidate that he is -- and YOU can help make that happen!
https://secure.responseenterprises.com/rightmarchpac/?a=7



Over the last year, the RightMarch.com PAC has been very active spreading the word about the Democrat frontrunners for President. We started by spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on direct mail and phone banking targeting Hillary Clinton. When that worked and we forced a REAL campaign race between her and Obama, we turned our attention to HIM, and spent another hundred thousand dollars targeting Obama.

But now, that race is over -- and a new race, to save our country from being overrun by a new invasion of illegal aliens, has begun.
We CANNOT let the forces of globalism and a "North American Union" win this election. We MUST get the TRUTH out about this man and his plans for OPEN BORDERS!
And we CAN -- with YOUR help!
TAKE ACTION: It was bad enough when our "leaders" in Washington, D.C. tried to shove an AMNESTY for illegals down our throats last year. WE STOPPED THEM -- but only because the grassroots (that's YOU and ME) took action and made our voices heard, in ways that couldn't be ignored!
Now, we're threatened with something even worse -- a candidate who believes that it's alright not only to give illegal aliens amnesty, but that we should open our borders and encourage even MORE illegals to pour into our nation!
HE MUST BE STOPPED -- and we're ready to STOP him. We're going to launch a series of issues-based postal and phone campaigns to tell the whole country where this radical leftist stands, starting with the most pressing issue of illegal immigration. Please click below NOW to make your best donation to the RightMarch.com PAC, as we continue our fight to STOP the Obama Express to the White House:

https://secure.responseenterprises.com/rightmarchpac/?a=7


Sincerely,

William Greene, President
RightMarch.com


P.S.: We will also be launching more campaigns against Obama, letting the country know about his radical left-wing stands on every issue, from immigration, to taxes, to spending, to bigger government, to abortion and gay marriage -- you name it, WE will be telling the country about it! But we need YOUR help to do it:

https://secure.responseenterprises.com/rightmarchpac/?a=7Be sure to send this Alert to EVERYONE you know who wants to help EXPOSE the threat that Barack Hussein Obama is to the security of America. Thank you!

 
 
 
 
 
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA'S PLANS TO TAX US ALL

Obama plans to return to the failed policies of high taxation coupled with
an expansion of government spending. 
Worse, Obama says he is absolutely committed to almost doubling the capitalgains rate - something he will easily accomplish with a Democrat Congress.In the coming months - when investors realize that Obama will raise the cap
gains rate - there could be a stampede of asset sales as investors rush totake their profits now to avoid Obama's doubling of the tax rates next year.All of these issues and more are explored  
Indeed, Obama makes no bones about his plans to go on a tax rampage. Notonly would he increase the capital-gains tax rate from 15 percent to as much as 28 percent, he wants to allow the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts to expire
in 2010, which effectively raises taxes on Americans by tens of billions of
dollars. He also wants to do away with the $102,000 FICA payroll tax cap, which means
anyone making over $102,000 would pay an additional 7 percent in taxes on
earned income. And the loan dividend tax rate George Bush implemented? Under President
Obama it will be DOA!
* How Obama's policies could cost more than $850 billion over four years
* The dire repercussions of Obama's minimum wage proposal for small businesses and retail outlets
* Obama aides' private and very revealing admission about the candidate's economic savvy
* The surprising revelation when Barack's own tax returns were reviewed by an expert
* The "proof" that Obama will kowtow to organized labor * Obama's Social Security plan: a giant income-redistribution scheme
* How Obama's policies could boost some tax rates to 60 percent  Leading economist Arthur Laffer's warning on Obamanomics  Obama's policies point by point on energy, healthcare, regulation,and the housing crisis * Who would lose under Obama's tax proposals - and who would win  How Barack "flunked" an easy question on capital gains * The Democrat's contradictory statements on tax increases * Why Obama's campaign against special interests would backfire * Obama's plan to double America's foreign aid * How Obama's trade policies would damage U.S. multinationals
* Obama's embarrassing denial regarding NAFTA
* The National Taxpayers Union's Obama rating: just 5 percent * Obama's misguided views on technology's future * How the Democrat would undermine private sector healthcare * Obama's tactics - old left-wing populist ploys 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SUPPORT LOU DOBBS AS HE 'S SUPPORTED US

The Hispanic Institute Proposes CNN Boycott;

Cites Lou Dobbs’ Anti-Immigration Crusade

The Hispanic Institute today announced that it will mount a Latino boycott of CNN to protest the cable news network’s ongoing distortion of facts surrounding U.S. immigration issues, especially in commentaries and reports on “Lou Dobbs Tonight.”

The nonprofit organization said the proposed boycott will begin today June 3, 2008 and will seek to stop Hispanic viewership of all CNN outlets, including the Spanish language service. There are now 12.14 million Hispanic television households in the U.S., according to Doug Darfield, Sr. Vice President of multicultural measurement for The Nielsen Company.

“We’re taking this step after years of CNN management’s failure to rein in Mr. Dobbs’s irresponsible assertions about immigrants and their impact on our country and its institutions,” Gus West, THI board chair, said in making the announcement. He added that THI will work with other national Hispanic organizations to broaden support for the proposed boycott.

West noted that THI called for censure of Dobbs two years ago, following three years of inflammatory on-air rhetoric about undocumented immigrants. “The lack of any meaningful response from CNN’s management, or any abatement of Mr. Dobbs’ offensive tirades, makes it clear to us that the company supports his misleading and often inaccurate positions,” he said.

The large and growing U.S. Hispanic population represents a significant television market, West said, one that CNN can ill afford to ignore. “The State of the Media 2008,” published by The Project for Excellence in Journalism, noted that Latino purchasing power was $850 billion in 2007, and, according to Nielsen Monitor-Plus, total TV advertising dollars spent to reach Hispanics in 2006 was more than $3 billion.

“We will mobilize this important market segment to make our strong convictions heard,” West said, adding that THI is not alone in its criticism of Dobbs. In “Fear & Loathing in Prime Time: Immigration Myths and Cable News,” an extensive new study published May 21, the Washington-based Media Matters Action Network reported that cable news program hosts Dobbs, Bill O’Reilly of Fox News Channel and Glenn Beck of CNN-Headline News “serve up a steady diet of fear, anger and resentment on the topic of illegal immigration.”

However, Dobbs was singled out by the Media Matters study as “one of the most obsessed with the topic.” The study added that the “Lou Dobbs Tonight” program “might be more properly called ‘Lou Dobbs Crusades Against Illegal Immigration Tonight.’”

It is clear to THI, West said, that a boycott is “the appropriate vehicle to address CNN’s obvious disregard for the concerns of Latino viewers and all others who value factual, responsible news and information.”

THIS JUST RECIEVED!!!!

hope everyone can watch Debate on illegal immigration that included Sandy Doty, StaceyO’Connell and Craig Tillman on CNN’s Rick Sanchez show tonight(7:30 p.m. PST) I sure don't like this guy, but will have to listen to it on xm as I am here I don't have cable!


As I said in my message to CNN

http://www.cnn.com/****/
Please support Lou Dobbs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

May be a very good independent presidential candidate

    Reply, quoting this comment    View printable version     Link to this comment   
Member Since:
April 9, 2008
Private Message
Comment updated April 21, 2008 11:57 AM

My name is Frank McEnulty and I am an independent candidate for President of the United States in the 2008 election.  I am also the 2008 Presidential nominee for the New American Independent Party in the same election.   I am writing to you in order to gain your support for my campaign to be elected President in the 2008 election. Before I tell you what I’d like to do as President let me tell you a little something about myself. 

I grew up in a lower-middle class family and am the 4th of 6 kids.  For the most part we were raised by my mother who worked as a nurse.  My father was gone by the time we were in high school and my mom always told us that we could go to any college “we” could afford so we’d better get to work. 

My first paper route came along about the time I was 12 and I’ve worked ever since then.  Even while in college as a full-time student I worked up to 30 hours a week in order to pay my own bills.  I’m used to taking responsibility for myself and believe that’s the way it should be for most everyone else. 

My wife, Cheryl, and I will have been married 20 years a week after the election in November and we have two daughters, Sara – 16 and Rebecca – 14.  Both girls are very active in sports with volleyball being their main sport of choice, while Sara also plays water polo.  It is mainly because of my concern for the future of my daughters and everyone’s sons and daughters that I am pursuing the Presidency of the United States in the 2008 election. 

In what little spare time I have I am a woodworker, wood turner, hunter, hiker and fisherman. 

I have an accounting and finance degree from California State University at Long Beach and a Masters Degree in Entrepreneur and Venture Management from the University of Southern California.  Most of my working life has been spent in management and finance positions in various aspects of the real estate industry and I believe my management background, the ability to deal with multiple situations and, especially, the ability to hire the right people for the right job gives me the skills necessary to manage the position of President of the United States. 

By spending the last 10 months on this campaign,  I realize most people think that I'm either A) nuts, B) wasting my time  or C) delusional that I could ever make a difference.    The most common questions I'm asked are: Why are you doing this?  Then they will say, Come on, you really don't believe that you can make a difference do you?   

Fair questions and here's the answer:

Yes, I do.  I'm fed up with where the politicians in charge have led this country. I am not a politician.  I'm not a radical.  Most of my positions would be described as moderate.  I'm fairly conservative on some issues, more liberal on others. And many people have described my overall viewpoint on things as quite libertarian.  So what am I?  I’m an American – that’s the only label I need and the only label I want.

But I'm also firm in my belief that the country is going in the wrong direction and we better do something about it before it's too late.  It is also my firm belief that there are millions of people that feel pretty much the same way I do, but don't know what to do about it. Well, I believe I have an idea of what we need to do.  And together, with your help and help of the people out there I call the Moderate Majority, we can accomplish a lot. 
 And just what do I believe we should do? Well, let's start with personal responsibility. I believe people should take responsibility for their own actions and their own lives.

I believe in a strong separation between the branches of the Federal Government. 
 

I believe in very strong state’s rights.  The Federal Government has been trampling on the states for way too long. 

I believe that all states should be treated fairly and equally in all respects. 

I believe the Federal government needs to get out of people’s lives on a daily basis.  This is just not what a Federal government or any government, for that matter, is supposed to do.   

I believe we pay enough in taxes and need to better manage our money. 

I believe that we need a much simpler, flat tax system.  I believe that the Federal Government is completely out of control on a fiscal level and needs to be reined in.

I believe that that we need comprehensive immigration reform based on strict enforcement of the immigration laws currently in place.

I believe the United States should not try to be the world’s savior, but has the moral obligation to "help" where and when it can do so at the request of the local people.

I believe in God, family and country and that they belong together.
 

I believe that abortion should be a last resort, but that it is a decision that must be left up to a woman, her family and her religious beliefs and that it should also be a right reserved for the states to decide.

I believe that the President of the United States should put America - not his or her political party - first. The President should be an American before a Republican or Democrat.

I believe that our military should never be used for political purposes, political gain or to advance an agenda.

I believe that all people are created equal and that all people should be able to be equal in all things.
 

I believe the President’s job is to look out for the welfare of all Americans and not just those of his political party or those who he thinks will vote for his party and him. 

I believe that judges should be judges and leave the passing and changing of laws to the politicians we have elected to do just that.

I believe that people are truly entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, but that no one is entitled to much beyond that unless they work to earn it themselves.  If you want a nice car or big screen TV, then work so you can go out and buy one.

I believe that political correctness is a real threat to open and honest dialogue.

I believe that true, positive change will never come from the Democrats or the Republicans.
 

I believe that the change we keep hearing about will only come from a coalition of third party organizations combining together to bring elections and candidates back to where they are concerned with what Americans want and less concerned with what their party wants. 

I believe that there are millions of people who are looking for a viable alternative to the same old, same old from the Republicans and Democrats and I intend to provide that alternative.

And finally, I believe that "Anything is Possible in America" and if we all work together for the common good it will continue to be that way. 
 

Can it be done?

Of course it can. There are examples everywhere of people rising up against what they see as a wrong and fixing it. Let me give you just one.  A few years ago in my home state of California, the people of the state got upset enough to actually recall the Governor.  Most politicos didn't believe it would happen.  How could anyone expect to recall a Democratic Governor in the State of California?  Well, we proved them wrong because enough people got together and made a difference.                 

As an independent candidate for President my administration will not be burdened by the partisanship that is rampant in this country. My focus will solely be on getting the job done right. Every decision that I will make as President of the United States will be based on four very simple questions:

1. Is it Good for America?
 By this I mean good for America as a whole, not for a special interest group, not for a specific industry, not for a specific political party, not for a specific politician's reelection, but good for America as a whole.

2. Is this Federal law really necessary?
 We have thousands and thousands of unnecessary Federal laws and way too many people in Congress trying to pass new ones all the time to help themselves get reelected. Unless a law is absolutely necessary for the American people as a whole, it should not be passed.

3. Is this a proper use of our tax money?
 The Republican administration that we have had in this country for the last several years has been on a spending spree unlike that seen in many, many years. What happened to the theory of fiscal responsibility and smaller government? We need to stop throwing money at every special project that people in Washington can dream up to buy votes and stop now.  

4. Is it a long-term solution to a problem or just a quick, feel-good fix?   No more quick, expensive, feel-good fixes that accomplish very little except make voters think you are doing something good for them.

I will not be afraid to veto new laws if I do not believe that they are in the best interest of all Americans.

As an independent President, I will not be under any obligation to pass a law to help a political party or to help get a certain senator or congressman reelected. I will have the freedom to do what is right for America rather than what is right for a special interest or political party.  

By myself, I can't accomplish much.  Let's face it, unless I can get a lot of people to support me and continue to gather momentum, the mainstream press and pretty much everyone else will just ignore me as if I never existed.  However, with your help and the help of your friends and their friends we can make a difference. 

As I stated above, I believe there are millions of people out there that think that the current political situation is bad for the country and that a change needs to be made.  When enough of us get together to make our voices heard - changes will be made. Thank-you for giving me a chance to share some of my views with you.  There is a lot more information on my website at www.frankforpresident.org and I’m willing to answer any questions or provide additional information to you on any topic.  Without groups like yours, there would be little hope for positive change ever occurring in the United States. 

Together we can and will make a difference. 

"Anything is Possible in America"

Sincerely,

Frank McEnulty

frank@frankforpresident.org

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Many trying to stop money from going to Mexico

Tancredo Attempts to Block Foreign Aid to Mexico and Central America

Amendment to “Merida Initiative” Would Have Blocked Funds Until
Corruption in Mexico Brought Under Control

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) – U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Littleton) today put forth an amendment in the House Foreign Affairs Committee attempting to block foreign aid under the Merida Initiative to Mexico. The amendment would block all funding until the President of the United States has certified that the Mexican government has met a list of requirements.

The maintenance of elementary law and order in the face of organized violence against law enforcement and legal institutions, infiltration of the armed services and local police by the drug cartels, and endemic corruption at all levels of government – these are the primary threats to Mexico’s people and democratic institutions today,” said Tancredo.

Among other things, the amendment would have required a determination that the armed forces and / or law enforcement agencies of Mexico (or any other recipient nation seeking aid) are not involved or complicit in the trafficking of drugs, weapons or people.

The original leaders of the notorious “Zetas,” the violent enforcers of the Gulf Cartel who have brought murder and mayhem to the Rio Grande Valley, were former Mexican military personnel with special forces training who deserted the army.

“We know that some of these ‘guns for hire’ had U.S. military training. We must insist that our dollars never again train soldiers who then take that training and expertise and use it to serve organized crime,” said Tancredo. “Mexico must be required to clean up its act before we send truckloads of our tax dollars south – or we run the risk of American aid being siphoned off by the very drug cartels we are trying to defeat.”

The amendment would also require the President to certify that the U.S.-Mexico border is secure before aid could be provided to Mexico.

The cartels only exist to smuggle drugs and people across our southwest border. If that border is made secure against all such smuggling, the cartels will be deprived of most of their profits – profits that feed corruption,” said Tancredo.

Tancredo’s amendment would also require, as a condition of receiving any U.S. aid, that a foreign government cooperate with all U.S. extradition requests and U.S. efforts to deport or repatriate nationals of that foreign country. The foreign government must also not assist or encourage its nationals to illegally immigrate to the U.S.

The amendment would also require a congressional vote on the President’s certifications before aid could flow.

“Congress should not provide this administration with a blank check once the State Department makes a handful of claims to this committee that may or may not be supported by evidence,” said Tancredo. “If the administration wants this money, they should have to convince Congress to give it to them.”

“We have to insist that governments like the one in Mexico tackle their internal corruption and get their houses in order before we start handing out tax dollars,” concluded Tancredo. “Without these safeguards, money sent to Mexico is as likely to end up in the pockets of the drug cartels as it is the reformers.”

The amendment failed 23 votes to 10. Those opposing the amendment were Howard Berman (D-CA), Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Eni Faleomavaega (D-AS), Donald Payne (D-NJ), Brad Sherman (D-CA), Robert Wexler (D-FL), Eliot Engel (D-NY), Gregory Meeks (D-NY), Diane Watson (D-CA), Adam Smith (D-WA), Russ Carnahan (D-MO), Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX), Ruben Hinojosa (D-TX), David Wu (D-OR), Brad Miller (D-NC), Linda Sanchez (D-CA), Albio Sires (D-NJ), Ron Klein (D-FL), Joseph Crowley (D-NY), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) and Luis Fortuno (R-PR). Those in favor were Tom Tancredo (R-CO), Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ), Dan Burton (R-IN), Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), Ed Royce (R-CA), Joe Wilson (R-SC), Gresham Barrett (R-SC), Michael McCaul (R-TX), Ted Poe (R-TX) and Gus Bilirakis (R-FL).

We need to give these people what for!!!!! I will find the addresses for each and post!!!! I have written Lou Dobbs, Glenn Beck everyone I could think of saying the sane thing as Tancredo

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mccain on the Pledge : great read

John McCain’s remarks about the Pledge of Allegiance

In light of the recent appeals court ruling in California , with respect to the Pledge of Allegiance, the following recollection from Senator John McCain is very appropriate:

‘The Pledge of Allegiance’ - by Senator John McCain
“As you may know, I spent five and one half years as a prisoner of war during the Vietnam War. In the early years of our imprisonment, the NVA kept us in solitary confinement or two or three to a cell. In 1971 the NVA moved us from these conditions of isolation into large rooms with as many as 30 to 40 men to a room.
This was, as you can imagine, a wonderful change and was a direct result of the efforts of millions of Americans on behalf of a few hundred POWs 10,000 miles from home.

One of the men who moved into my room was a young man named Mike Christian.
Mike came from a small town near Selma , Alabama . He didn’t wear a pair of shoes until he was 13 years old. At 17, he enliste d in the US Navy. He later earned a commission by going to Officer Training School Then he became a Naval Flight Officer and was shot down and captured in 1967. Mike had a keen and deep appreciation of the opportunities this country and our military provide for people who want to work and want to succeed.
As part of the change in treatment, the Vietnamese allowed some prisoners to receive packages from home. In some of these packages were handkerchiefs, scarves and other items of clothing.

Mike got himself a bamboo needle. Over a period of a couple of months, he created an American flag and sewed on the inside of his shirt.
Every afternoon, before we had a bowl of soup, we would hang Mike’s shirt on the wall of the cell and say the Pledge of Allegiance.

I know the Pledge of Allegiance may not seem the most important part of our day now, but I can assure you that in that stark cell it was indeed the most important and meaningful event.
One day the Vietnamese searched our cell, as they did periodically, and discovered Mike’s shirt with the flag sewn inside, and removed it.

That evening they returned, opened the door of the cell, and for the benefit of all of us, beat Mike Christian severely for the next couple of hours. Then, they opened the door of the cell and threw him in. We cleaned him up as well as we could.
The cell in which we lived had a concrete slab in the middle on which we slept Four naked light bulbs hung in each corner of the room.

As I said, we tried to clean up Mike as well as we could. After the excitement died down, I looked in the corner of the room, and sitting there beneath that dim light bulb with a piece of red cl oth, another shirt an d his bamboo needle, was my friend, Mike Christian. He was sitting there with his eyes almost shut from the beating he had received, making another American flag. He was not making the flag because it made Mike Christian feel better. He was making that flag because he knew how important it was to us to be able to Pledge our allegiance to our flag and country.

So the next time you say the Pledge of Allegiance, you must never forget the sacrifice and courage that thousands of Americans have made to build our nation and promote freedom around the world. You must remember our duty, our honor, and our country.”

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisable, with liberty and justice for all.”

PASS THIS ON… And on… And on! You can even send it back to me, I don’t mind, because its worth reading again.

Oh……and then you have this clown, who refuses to place his hand on his heart and say the pledge……

Subject: Remember this picture on election day!
Let’s all remember this on election day…if you have family serving in the military, make sure you send it along. I don’t care for Hillary, but at least she shows respect f or the country s he lives in!
I had heard about this but a picture is definitely worth 1000 words! God save us!!!

Senator Barack Obama, Governor Bill Richardson, Senator Hillary Clinton and Ruth Harkin stand during the national anthem.
Barack Hussein Obama’s photo (that’s his real name)……the article said he REFUSED TO NOT ONLY PUT HIS HAND ON HI S HEART DURING TH E PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, BUT REFUSED TO SAY THE PLEDGE…..how can a man like this expect to be our next Commander-in-Chief

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mrs Obama Rants

SEE LARRY’s STORY BELOW. Excerpt from HillBuzz report today:

The Michelle Obama Rant Tape was filmed between June 26th - July 1st 2004 in Chicago, IL at the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition Conference at Trinity United Church: specifically the Women’s Event.

Michelle Obama appeared as a panelist alongside Mrs. Khadijah Farrakhan and Mrs. James Meeks.

Bill Clinton spoke during the Conference, as did Bill Cosby and other speakers, but not at the panel Michelle attended.

Michelle Obama spoke at the Women’s Event, but referenced Bill Clinton in her rant — his presence at the conference was the impetus for her raving, it seems.

For about 30 minutes, Michelle Obama launched into a rant about the evils of America, and how America is to blame for the problems of Africa. Michelle personally blamed President Clinton for the deaths of millions of Africans and said America is responsible for the genocide of the Tutsis and other ethnic groups. She then launched into an attack on “whitey”, and talked about solutions to black on black crime in the realm of diverting those actions onto white America. Her rant was fueled by the crowd: they reacted strongly to what she said, so she got more passionate and enraged, and that’s when she completely loses it and says things that have made the mouths drop of everyone who’s seen this. …

The “tape” is a DVD that Trinity United sold on its website …

Breaking News from HillBUZZ

Posted: 04 Jun 2008 03:27 AM CDT

COMMENTS CLOSED. GO TO SECOND THREAD.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HOW TO DESTROY AMERICA

PostPosted: Sat May 24, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject: How to Destroy Amerika.....Snopes Confirmed Reply with quote

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/lamm.asp


We know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was an immigration overpopulation conference in Washington, DC, filled to capacity by many of America's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, 'Mexifornia,' explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.



Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America.



The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of th e United States . He said, 'If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America . It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.''



'Here is how they do it,' Lamm said:



'First, to destroy America , turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: 'The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, Corsicans and Muslims.'



Lamm went on:



'Second, to destroy America, invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. Make it an article of belief that all cultures a re equal; that there are no cultural differences. Make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.



'Third, we could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent success of our own multi-ethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.' Lamm said, 'I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities'



'Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school.'



'My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in eth nic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.'



'My sixth plan for America's downfall would include d ual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precept. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy, Persia , threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. 'E. Pluribus Unum' -- From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we will 'Balkanize' America as surely as Kosovo. '



'Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits. Make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - th at stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culture, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them.'



In the la